On Hiroshima Anniversary, American Pope Confronts Nuclear Weapons — and America

Pope Leo warns the world: deterrence is no longer defensible, even when America leads the charge.

The most consistent theme of Pope Leo’s nearly three-month pontificate has been global peace.

Dear friends,

Thanks to everyone’s incredible support, Letters from Leo has climbed as high as #6 on Substack’s list of best-selling news publications.

I’ve got a full-time day job, so I can only continue to do this work with your generosity. If you find value in my work, please become a paid subscriber or make a one-time donation today.

Thank you again for your continued support!

On the 80th anniversary of Hiroshima, Pope Leo XIV confronted the nuclear status quo.

At his Wednesday General Audience in Rome, he condemned nuclear deterrence as “illusory security” and insisted that the horrors of Hiroshima must serve as a lasting warning against nuclear weapons.

He noted the bombing killed approximately 78,000 people instantly — and argued that only dialogue, not destruction, can sustain peace.

As the first U.S.-born pope, Leo builds on Pope Francis’s 2017 rejection of nuclear weapon possession by questioning the very logic of deterrence.

In a letter to Hiroshima’s bishop, he wrote that nuclear arms “offend our shared humanity,” and urged the world to embrace a global ethic rooted in justice and the common good.

His push for peace isn’t new — it’s been the most consistent theme of this nearly three-month-old pontificate.

When Donald Trump bombed Iran’s nuclear sites in late June, Leo responded swiftly:

“Every member of the international community has a moral responsibility: stop the tragedy of war before it becomes an irreparable abyss. …Let diplomacy silence the weapons.”

Leo’s newest comments come as Catholic bishops from Japan, South Korea, and the United States gathered in Hiroshima to jointly condemn all war and the possession of nuclear arms.

Leo is no partisan actor — but he is a moral one. He confronts his own country’s policies when they contradict Catholic teaching.

And his style of resistance — measured, strategic, relentless — might be the most dangerous kind.

By responding to both Hiroshima and Trump’s strike on Iran, he asks Americans a blunt question: will we continue to justify violence, or dare to imagine a disarmed peace?

Francis said nuclear weapons offend humanity. Leo goes even further: peace built on terror isn’t peace at all.

This is no rhetorical gesture.

It’s the Church — under Leo — flexing its growing muscle against nuclear weapons.

He ties the devastation of 1945 to the brinkmanship of 2025.

His voice bridges faith and geopolitics, calling leaders to choose peace over power.

In a world on edge — from Iran to Israel to Russia — Leo’s words could reshape the global debate.

If an American pope can imagine a world without the bomb, the question is: can his country rise to that moral imagination?

Thank you for reading! If you find value in my work, please become a paid subscriber or make a one-time donation today.