Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sarah Reynolds's avatar

He is so woke! I love him! 👏💕

Expand full comment
RJ O’Connor's avatar

This is good news and thank you for highlighting it Mr. Hale.

Yes, universal norms of zero tolerance for clergy sexual abuse are well past due. Yet that needed norm would be a reaction to the symptom of clerical abuse. I believe the underlying cause of the abuse is how future priests are formed in seminaries.

Having spent many years in seminary formation both within a religious order and a diocesan seminary, I can attest that not enough is done to form future priests outside of that system. The greatest blind spot is the lack of trained laity to assist in a seminarian’s formation. I don’t think you can find well integrated lay involvement in any priestly formation program but I’m sure attempts have been and are being made.

Why lay involvement? Because the life experience of lay men and women not to mention their professional experience can profoundly assist in evaluating the worthiness of any candidate for Holy Orders. With their involvement in any formation program, I believe instances of sexual abuse by the clergy would diminish is not disappear. They would evaluate differently than how the current system, overseen mostly by the clergy, evaluates.

Priestly formation should be a two tiered structure/process with each tier working together yet independently for the good of the candidate and the Church.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts